UKH Journal of Science and Engineering | Volume 5 • Number 1 • 2021 62
Due to the abovementioned challenges, opportunities and features that present in implementing IPSs, diverse
approaches and technologies have been used for indoor positioning and navigation systems in literature, each with
specific advantages and drawbacks, as mentioned below:
Proximity based systems can find object positions within a building at room level accuracy through the usage of
beacons and tags. This method offers a simple IPS at almost the lowest cost compared to other techniques with the
lowest accuracy.
IPS considers Bluetooth technology as a resource and a competitor to Wi-Fi based IPS techniques. BLE is a good
example of this technique (Kriz et al., 2016). In recent health care work, BLE beacons were used to track patients
holding BLE tags in a hospital as an indoor environment (X. Lin, 2015). Moreover, an indoor localization and navigation
solution was proposed using short range BLE to identify the location of different structures, which could be used as a
self-sufficient navigation system for visually impaired people using an android application (Nagarajan et al., 2020).
Another technique is known as WiFi-based systems. In this method, WiFi transmitters are used as tags (Kim et al.,
2016). The position of a tag would be calculated by an algorithm that takes the information about time and strength of
the packets that were transmitted by the tag to a number of different access points in the facility from a common
backend. This method has the accuracy of three to five meters (Gezici, 2008). To further improve this accuracy level,
additional WiFi access points should be added, since it works on the time difference of arrival (TDOA) measurement
principle which would be an expensive, cost demanding method and more a more energy consuming option compared
to other alternatives.
UWB is a pinpoint precision technology which is used in an indoor localization system. Although, it has the most
accurate position measurement capability, its main drawback is the cost as it is the most expensive available technology
for IPS. In this technique, a very wide pulse over a GHz spectrum is transmitted by several UWB transceivers. They
then listen to the short coded ultra-wide response pulses generated by UWB tags. Then, a very accurate time
measurement report would be sent to a central server by each of them. A human indoor localization technique is
proposed by using UWB technology with time delay measurements. The localization of human position is done through
UWB based distance data, in addition, a time delay localization model is employed by using an extended finite impulse
response (EFIR) filter (Xu et al., 2017). High accuracy and installation cost, limit the usage of this technology to precision
specific scenarios such as in material flow control in a manufacturing facility and warehousing for inventory control.
While it would be a poorly utilized option if used in hospitals and places where pinpoint accuracy is not a must.
Ultrasonic or acoustic systems are another available system used in indoor positioning. This system works exactly the
same way as UWB and has the same architectural design except that it uses sound waves instead of radio waves.
Receivers receive ultrasonic sound waves generated by tags. This system’s accuracy is roughly close to that of UWB but
it has non-line of sight (NLOS) issues when the beacon and tags are interrupted by obstacles. A novel sensor grid
transmitter technique has been proposed for adoption in indoor positioning applications for vehicle navigation. It uses
40 KHz ultrasonic transmitters that transmit ultrasonic signals and a vehicle position is calculated by measuring the
arrival time of incoming ultrasonic signals (Kapoor et al., 2016).
Optical technology-based systems, use both visible and invisible lights for estimating a tag’s position. Infra-red (IR)
light pulses are used in infrared based systems for indoor positioning and localization. In this system, installed IR
receivers in every area read IR pulses generated from the IR tags. This system is a very reliable way to assure room level
accuracy, since it uses infra-red (IR) pulses which are light pulses that cannot penetrate the walls in contrast to radio
waves. In other words, radio wave-based systems suffer more from false readings or indications due to their ability to
penetrate walls, thus in some cases a dedicated tag’s signals could be sensed by other readers not related to the indicated
room or area through the walls. In general, radio wave-based systems perform better in open space areas such as,
manufacturing warehouses, while light and sound-based systems are best suited to closed areas such as hospitals.
We can conclude that with all of the systems mentioned, their application and selection is highly dependent upon the
deployment environment and required level of accuracy. However, their deployment for indoor positioning and
navigation services in a warehouse or shop floor environment is highly restricted to the performance challenges of each
technique in these environments.
Optical technology-based systems, IR based systems for instance, face serious issues when implemented in a warehouse
environment such as the accuracy and reliability are affected by many optical signal characteristics including reflectivity
and scattering when hitting obstacles, as well as the requirement of line of sight (LOS) clearance between anchors and
tags. Due to these challenges, implementing IR based navigation in a warehouse is challenging and has poor accuracy
due to the many different objects with different dimensions which in turn results in poor LOS (Brena et al., 2017). On
the other hand, other radio wave-based techniques require special designs as they are not easily configurable to
constructional changes and new area planning as well as their considerably expensive prices. Table 1 illustrates the
different navigation systems with their associated advantages and drawbacks.