A Review of Nader Khalili Shelter Design Thoughts from the Sustainability

Authors

Keywords:

Modernism, Nader Khalili, Traditional Designing, Housing, Sandbag

Abstract

Contemporary architecture exists in Nader Khalili’s creative designs, including house designs in the USA and Iran, combined with the traditional architecture of Iran.  His designs are founded on four characteristics, first is the inspiration from nature, and the other three focuses on low-cost, self-help, and eco-friendliness. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate his architectural thinking and the design process that leads to a rapid and sustainable shelter. In addition, this shelter can be built-in critical conditions or can be long-lasting in any crucial situation. The methodology used in this study is analytical based on qualitative and quantitative approach. The method, which is used to collect the data, is based on literature review and observation. The study concludes that Khalili’s designs are reasonable at low prices and quickly built and sustainable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Hirou Karimi, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus, Turkey

    She is holding a master's degree in architectural engineering from Tabriz Islamic Azad University, Iran. She demonstrate a very good academic performance during her master studies, as she completed her master's degree as the top student in the architectural engineering department in less than 2 years, as a high honored student. She has five publications in SCI-indexed journals and Ten conference papers. Furthermore, she has authored three books. All of her journal publications and books are related to architecture, solar thermal energy, HVAC, thermal energy storage and energy systems, green architecture, and urban design.

References

Brandt, L. M. (2020). An introduction to making modern architecture matter. The Public Historian, 42(4), 137–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2020.42.4.137.
Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 2: The Contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2), 221-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900205
Bustelo, J. A. (2013). La Casa Con Patio En Mies Van Der Rohe. Proyecto, Progreso, Arquitectura, 8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/ppa.2013.i8.03.
Candelaria, S. L., Shao, Y., Zhou, W., Li, X., Xiao, J., Zhang, J. G., Wang, Y., et al. (2012). Nanostructured carbon for energy storage and conversion. Nano Energy, 1(2), 195-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.006.
Cal-Earth Institute (1992). Sandbag shelter prototypes: Various locations worldwide. The Aga Khan Award for Architecture. Hesperia, United States. URL: https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/sites/default/files/2019/05/Sandbag%20Shelters%20-%20Iran.pdf.
Cervilla, A. (2018). The evolution of the image of structure in the houses of Mies van der Rohe. ZARCH. (11), 122–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2018113211.
Esteban-Maluenda, A., Carrasco, L. S. & Moreno, L. S. P. (2020). Architext mining: Applying text analytics to research on modern architecture. Zivot Umjetnosti, 105(2), 158-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31664/ZU.2019.105.07.
Fayos, J. S., Sevilla, L. L. & Requejo, Z. G. (2018). Relationships between architecture and structure: Structural Architecture in the work of Mies van der Rohe. ZARCH, (11), 78-93. URL: https://www.academia.edu/38166901/Relationships_between_Architecture_and_Structure_Structural_Architecture_in_the_work_of_Mies_van_der_Rohe.
Flórez de la Colina, M. A. (2004). Smart houses, towards a definition. Informes de La Construcción, 56(494), 11-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.2004.v56.i494.444.
Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society, 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02064-120130.
Gaston, K. J. (2003). The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford and New York: Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution.
Gobbens, R. J., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T. & Schols, J. M. (2010). Toward a conceptual definition of frail community dwelling older people. Nursing Outlook, 58(2), 76-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2009.09.005.
Hart, K. (2008). A Short History of Earthbag Building. URL: http://www.greenhomebuilding.com/articles/earthbaghistory.htm.
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511597237.
Hinning, J. P., & Saad, D. (2015). Bioconstruções: superadobe como vetor da sustentabilidade. Revista Monografias Ambientais, 14, 66–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818738.
Islam, S. M. R., Kwak, D., Kabir, M. H., Hossain, M. & Kwak, K. S. (2015). The internet of things for health care: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 3, 678-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951.
Jiang, C., Moniz, S. J. A., Wang, A., Zhang, T. & Tang, J. (2017). Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting-materials and challenges. Chemical Society Reviews, 46, 4645-4660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00306k.
Kamal, R. & Rahman, M. S. (April 2018). A study on feasibility of super adobe technology -an energy efficient building system using natural resources in Bangladesh. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/143/1/012043.
Kang, J., Martinez, C. M. J. & Johnson, C. (2021). Minimalism as a sustainable lifestyle: Its behavioral representations and contributions to emotional well-being. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 802-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.001.
Khalili, N. (2011). Emergency sandbag shelter and eco-village. Hesperia, CA: Cal-Earth Press.
Krier, R. (1983). Elements of Architecture. London: ACADEMY GROUP LTD. URL: https://robkrier.de/elements-of-architecture.php#page-001.
Lyubomksky, S., Sheldon, K. M. & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.
Mitchell, R.B. (2003). Young, O. R., The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 3, 191–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024850005580.
Nia, H. A. & Rahbarianyazd, R. (2020). Aesthetics of Modern Architecture: A Semiological Survey on the Aesthetic Contribution of Modern Architecture. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 8(2), 66 - 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2020.080204.
Sarmiento, J. P., Sandoval, V. & Jerath, M. (2020). The influence of land tenure and dwelling occupancy on disaster risk reduction. The case of eight informal settlements in six Latin American and Caribbean countries. Progress in Disaster Science, 5, 100054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100054.
Sobin, H. J. & Olgyay, V. (1963). Design with Climate: Bioclimatic Approach to Architectural Regionalism. Journal of Architectural Education (1947-1974), 18(3), 43-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1424217.
Sykes, J. F. J. (1900). Definition of “House”. Public Health, 12(6), 482–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3506(00)80334-0.
Young, O. R. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Published

2022-12-27

Issue

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

A Review of Nader Khalili Shelter Design Thoughts from the Sustainability. (2022). UKH Journal of Science and Engineering, 6(2), 1-7. https://journals.ukh.edu.krd/index.php/ukhjse/article/view/458

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>