The Status of Responsibility to Protect in the International Law and Whether Doctrine Advances Use of Military Force for Humanitarian Ends

Authors

  • Sheraz Ibrahim Department of Law, College of Law and International Relations, Lebanese French University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjss.v7n1y2023.pp1-7

Keywords:

Responsibility to Protect, R2P, International Law, Military Force, Humanitarian Intervention, United Nations, Security Council

Abstract

This paper offers a delicate understanding of the responsibility to protect (R2P) principle and analyses the status of this significant principle within the international law. The place of the use of force is evaluated within R2P doctrine. The R2P norm and the pillars contained therein will be analysed to set out the legal responsibilities it contains towards member states and the international community, assessing the legality of the responsibilities held by states towards its population in addition to responsibilities owed by states to populations in other states and the obligation from the international community to intervene. Identifying the issues surrounding the principle of R2P in international law and the message it delivers with what it involves and what responsibilities it carries. It also illustrates the importance of the evolution of the concept, and the advances evolving around the principle including the use of military force for humanitarian ends.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, S. (2015). Failure to Protect: Syria and the UN Security Council. Global Center for the Responsibility to Protect. Retrieved 20 September 2020 from URL: https://www.globalr2p.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/syriapaper_final.pdf.
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).
European Convention on Human Rights (1950).
Holzgrefe, J. L. and Keohane, R. (Ed.) (2003). Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge University Press.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).
Kuperman, A. (2009). Rethinking the Responsibility to Protect. The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 10(1), 19-29. URL: https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/journals/shjdir/v10i1/f_0018632_15956.pdf.
Massingham, E. (2009). Military intervention for humanitarian purposes: does the Responsibility to Protect doctrine advance the legality of the use of force for humanitarian ends?. International Review of the Red Cross, 91(876), 803-831. URL: https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/irrc-876-massingham.pdf.
Pattison, J. (2010). Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility To Protect: Who Should Intervene?. Oxford University Press. URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/8614.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998).
Stahn, C. (2017). Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm?. American Journal of International Law, 101(1), 99-120. DOI: 10.1017/S0002930000029559.
Statute of the International Court of Justice (1945).
United Nations Charter 1945.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
"WE THE PEOPLES: THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY" PRESENTED TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY BY SECRETARY-GENERAL. (2000). Retrieved 20 September 2020 from United Nations URL: https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000403.ga9704.doc.html.
Williams, P. D. and Bellamy, A. J. (2005). The responsibility to protect and the crisis in Darfur. Security Dialogue, 36(1), 27-47.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-11

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

The Status of Responsibility to Protect in the International Law and Whether Doctrine Advances Use of Military Force for Humanitarian Ends. (2024). UKH Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjss.v7n1y2023.pp1-7

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>